Re: SFCGAL 1.2.1 (1.2.2 out now)
Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> wrote:
> Thanks, but we need a new round for the 1.2.2 release.
Whats the story with 1.2.2? I did not understand the email as 1.2.1 seemed
to work.
>> I did however not increase the version number and rebuild the package.
>
> You don't need to increase the version number, only the debian revision
> in the changelog.
Which is what I meant by "version number".
> It's currently not possible to build sfcgal due to unsatisfied
> dependencies for samba-libs, so we need to get that fixed before a new
> upload to experimental can be done.
samba?!
Sven
--
"Thinking of using NT for your critical apps?
Isn't there enough suffering in the world?"
(Advertisement of Sun Microsystems in Wall Street Journal)
/me is giggls@ircnet, http://sven.gegg.us/ on the Web
Reply to: