Re: JOSM backports and its negative effect on other packages

[Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net>]

Sebastiaan Couwenberg <sebastic@xs4all.nl> writes:

> On 24-10-15 11:01, Felix Natter wrote:
>> Backporting JMapViewer (and thus Freeplane) to jessie would
>> involve backporting knopflerfish (which should be easy because no
>> other r-deps need to be fixed) and possibly (if Freeplane 1.6 will be
>> released in time) "insubstantial" (flamingo/substance/trident) as well,
>> which includes fixing several r-deps (which I consider to be a lot of
>> work!).

hello Bas,

>> BTW: I will be away from my workstation from ~ 17.11.-8.12. (or even
>> until 15.12.). Do you want to upgrade JMapViewer in that time frame?
>
> No, I'm in no hurry to backport JOSM.

I was also asking about new unstable uploads of JOSM/JMapViewer.

> Because of the lack of feedback on this list, I think this discussion
> should also be done on the java list to get the perspective of the
> metadata-extractor & tika maintainers.

That's probably a good idea.

Best Regards,
-- 
Felix Natter