Re: Fwd: Re: gfortran and netcdf transitions
On 08/10/2015 10:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> I'm not sure if it's wise to start the netcdf transition already, even
> though I would prefer to transition to the new netcdf packages instead
> of doing a v5 rename. A number of reverse dependencies cannot be built
> in unstable because the libdap transition (#791114) hasn't started
> yet, so libstdc++6 still breaks the current libdap version in unstable
> on which gdal among others (build) depends, and so most GIS package
> cannot be built because they (build) depend on gdal. This includes
> gmt, ncl & vtk6 that are part of the netcdf transition.
is there a reason to not start the libdap transition? it's already in experimental.