Re: Fwd: Re: gfortran and netcdf transitions
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
On 10/08/2015 09:48, Matthias Klose wrote:
> On 08/10/2015 10:42 AM, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
>> On 10-08-15 08:45, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>> I'm not sure if it's wise to start the netcdf transition already, even
>> though I would prefer to transition to the new netcdf packages instead
>> of doing a v5 rename. A number of reverse dependencies cannot be built
>> in unstable because the libdap transition (#791114) hasn't started
>> yet, so libstdc++6 still breaks the current libdap version in unstable
>> on which gdal among others (build) depends, and so most GIS package
>> cannot be built because they (build) depend on gdal. This includes
>> gmt, ncl & vtk6 that are part of the netcdf transition.
> is there a reason to not start the libdap transition? it's already in
I believe not: I think we should go with libdap now. Its awating an OK
from the RM team; if there is a problem its with gdal. I've tested a
libdap build with grads.
Alastair McKinstry, <firstname.lastname@example.org>, <email@example.com>,
Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----