[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: netcdf / g++ Transition

On 13/07/15 14:15, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
> On 13/07/2015 12:50, sebastic wrote:
>> On 2015-07-13 13:40, Alastair McKinstry wrote:
>>> So, whats the current status of the netCDF transition?
>> We still need to verify all reverse dependencies before we can request
> a transition slot.
> Ok, I'll start with my packages then. Experimental builds.
>>> What about collisions with the gcc-5 transition?
>> The GCC-5 related transitions are going to be painful, that's why I
> hope to get the gdal & spatialite transitions done before GCC-5, but it
> seems unlikely.
> Yes. This gets confusing.
> I have a package libdap, upon which gdal depends. Its just undergone a
> transition 3.12 -> 3.14.0 that included SONAME changes. It has two
> rdepends, gdal and grads.  I had set an RC bug against libdap to block

No. There was no RC bug at all.

> it from transitioning until g++-5 transition (as it has c++11 symbol
> changes) but its been removed and libdap 3.14.0 has transitioned.
> gdal has been binNMU'd and will transition.


> So what happens? Does testing get rebuilt with g++-5 ? (unlikely, but a
> good idea, I think),

Not going to happen.

> or is another transition necessary for
> libdapclient6 -> libdapclient6v5 with the g++ transition?

You need another transition if the ABI changes with the new libstdc++.


Reply to: