|
So, whats the current status of the netCDF transition? All the netcdf-* packages appear to build, are there outstanding bugs or should we just kick off the transition? What about collisions with the gcc-5 transition? regards Alastair On 29/06/2015 20:16, Ross Gammon wrote: > So - the c++ round of builds: > > kst (2.0.3-4) OK > magics++ (2.24.4-1~exp1) OK - Thanks Alastair > vtk (?) OK with libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev - thanks Nico > vtk6 (6.2.0+dfsg1) OK with both libnetcdf-dev & > libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev > metview OK with both libnetcdf-dev & > libnetcdf-cxx-legacy-dev > > Regards, > > Ross > > On 06/24/2015 12:21 AM, Ross Gammon wrote: >> Hi All, >> >> With netcdf-fortran now in experimental, I have done a round of builds >> of the reverse dependencies using Bas's tracker: >> >> cdftools (3.0.1) OK >> etsf-io (1.0.3 & 1.0.4 in experimental) OK >> ferrit-vis (6.9.2) OK >> oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022) OK >> >> In all cases, the packages must build depend on both libnetcdf-dev and >> libnetcdff-dev. >> >> Regards, >> >> Ross >> >> On 06/14/2015 04:58 PM, Ross Gammon wrote: >>> Hi All, >>> >>> I have just finished a first pass build of all Dependency Level 2 >>> reverse dependencies of netcdf (netcdf-dev & netcdf-bin). Here are the >>> results: >>> >>> adios (1.7.0-4) [ma:same] OK >>> cdftools (3.0-1) Fails, needs Fortran >>> cmor (2.9.1-5) [ma:same] OK >>> dx (1:4.4.4-7) OK >>> etsf-io (1.0.3-4) Fails * >>> exodusii (6.02.dfsg.1-5) [ma:same] OK >>> ferret-vis (6.9-2) Fails, needs Fortran >>> gdal (1.10.1+dfsg-8)(1.11.2+dfsg) OK >>> gmt (4.5.12-1) Fails, but HDF5? ** >>> gnudatalanguage (0.9.5-2) Fails, but HDF5? >>> grace (1:5.1.25-1) OK >>> grads (2:2.0.2-3) OK >>> gri (2.12.23-8) OK >>> kst (2.0.3-4) OK >>> libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.20-1) Fails, *** >>> magics++ (2.22.7.dfsg.1-4) [ma:same] Fails, needs C++ >>> minc (2.2.00-6) [ma:same] Fails Testsuite >>> nco (4.4.9-1) Fails >>> ncview (2.1.5+ds1-1) Fails, **** >>> oasis3 (3.mct+dfsg.121022-2) [ma:same] Fails, needs Fortran >>> octave-octcdf (1.1.7-2) Fails, but HDF5? >>> ovito (2.3.3-3) OK >>> python-scientific (2.9.4-3) OK >>> r-cran-ncdf4 (1.13-1) Fails >>> r-cran-rnetcdf (1.6.3-1-1) OK >>> ruby-netcdf (0.6.6-2) Fails, *** >>> v-sim (3.7.2-1) OK >>> vtk (5.8.0-17.5) Fails, needs C++ >>> >>> * "No 'NetCDF' module found." 1.0.4-1~exp1.dsc also fails, may need >>> Fortran >>> ** 5.1 also failing with: "Library found but netCDF-4/HDF5 format" >>> *** can't find netcdf >>> **** wrong c compiler >>> >>> I will let the machine cool down for a bit ;-) , and then I will >>> investigate the failures not requiring Fortran or C++ a bit deeper. >>> >>> Regards, >>> >>> Ross >>> >> >> > > > > -- > Alastair McKinstry, <alastair@sceal.ie>, <mckinstry@debian.org>, https://diaspora.sceal.ie/u/amckinstry > Software is like Poetry - most of it shouldn't have been written. |