[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Please do not forget to mention Debian GIS in release notes [was: Bug#782695: release-notes: please add news from Debian Med to release notes]



Hi again

just to get on your nerves a bit:  I'd *really* consider it very
important that Debian GIS shows up in the release notes.  Otherwise
you will loose a singular chance to propagate the project in the
news which could bring several new developers and users.

Thanks for considering

     Andreas.

PS: I'd even volunteer to write a draft but we need to be really
    quick.

On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 02:58:27PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> I would mention something in the lines
> 
>    fruitful cooperation with UbuntuGIS has shown first results
> 
> Just rememeber that Debian release notes have a wide user coverage and
> it would not harm if this cooperation is mentioned here to let people
> know.
> 
> 
> Just my 2 Euro-Cents
> 
>     Andreas.
> 
> > Hi Andreas,
> > 
> > Thanks for your consideration.
> > 
> > > I'd consider mentioning Debian GIS in release notes as quite important.
> > > Feel free to follow the example bug report (and press thumbs that it is
> > > not yet to late).
> > 
> > I don't know what we could mention to justify an entry in the release notes.
> > 
> > Not much has happened since wheezy, except that most of the packages were
> > updated. This is not notable by itself, because it's expected in a new
> > stable release. Initially many of the GIS package had the same version in
> > stable, testing & unstable, that's fortunately no longer the case.
> > 
> > For jessie I'm considering actively providing backports, but I've not
> > committed to this yet. If I had, it could be noteworthy. At the moment I
> > don't expect backports to be very viable due to dependency constraints.
> > 
> > I expect the stretch release to have more noteworthy Debian GIS changes
> > with GDAL 2.0, the next QGIS LTR, new OSM related packages, etc.
> > 
> > Kind Regards,
> > 
> > Bas
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> -- 
> http://fam-tille.de

-- 
http://fam-tille.de


Reply to: