[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: [Ubuntu] Packaging Orfeo Toolbox for Debian



Considering that OTB is not a package developed by volunteers I think
that the OTB developers are the ones who have to decide whether they
want to produce a
Debian package and allocate the necessary resources. In particular, if the
only problem left is filling a file with
licenses information and Debian is one of the most important linux
distributions.
I think this is totally up to the OTB developers.
Best,
Agus


On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 8:12 PM, Andreas Tille <andreas@an3as.eu> wrote:
> Hi Agustin,
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2014 at 04:40:59PM +0100, Agustin Lobo wrote:
>> Let me know which edits in particular must be made and I will give it a try.
>
> I think the rejection message here
>
>    https://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-October/023010.html
>
> says it all.  I'd recommend to
>
>    gbp-clone git://anonscm.debian.org/pkg-grass/otb.git
>
> to obtain the packaging repository.  By doing
>
>    licensecheck -r *
>
> with some sensible grep expressions you will find the files that are
> missing in debian/copyright (or you have some better strategy to find
> them).  The exact format yo need to specify debian/cyopright files
> can be found in the first line - just follow the URL mentioned there.
>
> You also mentioned that you need an otb package for your private work.
>
> If you have the repository you can get it by issuing
>
>    git-buildpackage
>
> as described in Debian GIS policy.  BTW, since you mentioned Linux Mint:
> I have severe doubt that the otb package as it currently is will run /
> build on Linux Mint.  I'm afraid not everything (like for instance
> libinsighttoolkit4-dev) is available in Mint.  So your mileage might
> vary.
>
> Hope this helps
>
>     Andreas.
>
>> >> No, there are some packaging issues to resolve first, see:
>> >>
>> >> http://lists.alioth.debian.org/pipermail/pkg-grass-devel/2014-October/023773.html
>> >
>> > Agustin, the problems mentioned here are very formal and can be solved
>> > by anybody who is able to read license texts and edit the
>> > debian/copyright file.  I have my focus on different things than on OTB
>> > and wanted to help only on *technical* issues.  So if there is any
>> > volunteer to help editing d/copyright OTB can be included into Debian.
>> > However, I'm afraid we missed the window where it can be part of the
>> > next stable release.
>> >
>> > Hope this clarifies things.
>> >
>> > Kind regards
>> >
>> >        Andreas.
>> >
>> > --
>> > http://fam-tille.de
>> >
>> >
>> > --
>> > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-request@lists.debian.org
>> > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>> > Archive: [🔎] 20141027144427.GA30219@an3as.eu">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20141027144427.GA30219@an3as.eu
>> >
>>
>
> --
> http://fam-tille.de
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gis-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
> Archive: [🔎] 20141027191221.GA31757@an3as.eu">https://lists.debian.org/[🔎] 20141027191221.GA31757@an3as.eu
>


Reply to: