Re: pycsw - precompiled docs
On 10/07/2014 09:56 AM, Johan Van de Wauw wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I've updated the pycsw package and I think it is almost ready for
> jessie. Please review if you have some time!
Can you push your pristine-tar branch, it's missing the commit for
1.10.0+dfsg?
> There are some remaining issues for which I'm not sure what would be
> the best solution:
> * the package contains some precompiled docs. I don't use these docs
> but recompile on the fly (removing google analytics and using jquery
> and underscore from debian packages). Should I remove this
> documentation or should I add a a lintian override saying that the
> precompiled javascript files are not used?
You seem to have solved this nicely.
> *I'm not entirely sure I handle my postinst correctly. In fact lintian
> complains that there is no error handling. Anyone knows a good example
> I could use? Should I enable cgi in my postinst? In fact I'm wondering
> if it would not be better to use WSGI. I used cgi because that was how
> the original packaging was done.
The maintainer scripts weren't limited to the appropriate targets. I've
pushed a change to address this.
As discussed elsewhere in this thread, moving from CGI to WSGI is a good
idea.
I've also added the copyright and license for the OGC schemas.
Addressing the remaining extra-license-file lintian issue, and the
possible-documentation-but-no-doc-base-registration issue, are still TODO.
I'm not sure if it's desirable to have so much stuff web accessible
under /var/www/html.
The python-pycsw package contains the ./debian/python-pycsw/usr/lib
directory structure which it shouldn't.
> Regards,
> Johan
Kind Regards,
Bas
--
GPG Key ID: 4096R/E88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146 50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1
Reply to: