Re: [DebianGIS] current situation
On Wed, Jan 16, 2008 at 08:22:04AM +0100, Paolo Cavallini wrote:
> How about having both grass and grass-ng (as it happens, e.g., for
> scribus)? I think grass63 is quite stable, and has many useful new
> features who would be good not to miss. For a comparison, grass63 is
> included in the new qgis release for windows, so I would not like we
> linux users to be put at a disadvantage.
> All the best.
We used to have a grass-cvs version in the past. I'm not to inclined
to that because a snapshot is a snapshot, it could be casually
broken at stable freezing and that would be a pity. Much better
a decent supported svn branch IMHO.
Francesco P. Lovergine