Re: [DebianGIS] ready for gdal 1.3.1 in debain unstable
I am willing to take on GDAL. I however will be
traveling for one month and out of email range.
Upon my return I can work with you to provide future
GDAL packages in the formats that you requested.
The group should decide this though.
Jon
--- Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> wrote:
> [Jon Saints]
> > Could either Peter or Francisco upload debiangis
> gdal 1.3.1 to
> > Debian unstable for us?
> >
> > Last I remember hearing on our list (correct me if
> I am wrong),
> > Silke Reimer was looking for debianGIS support to
> maintain GDAL.
> > Its really up to our group to keep this package
> alive.
>
> Sorry for the long delay. I've been occupied with
> real life. :)
>
> I am willing to sponsor packages, but not willing to
> take over the
> maintenence. I've got too many other things going
> on, so I would do a
> bad job if I tried to maintain more packages.
>
> When sponsoring, I prefer being approached by the
> package maintainer
> on IRC (pere on #geo/irc.oftc.net) with the URL to
> where the package
> can be downloaded. This is a low-overhead solution
> to me, and I do
> not accumulate a large backlog of request for
> sponsoring (as would
> happen if I tried to gather sponsor request using
> email. :).
>
> The packages should be lintian clean and tested in
> pbuilder or
> similar, to make sure the dependencies are correct
> and obvious
> problems are found. I primarily sponsor packages
> going into
> debian/main, so if the package isn't acceptable for
> main, there is
> normally no need to approach me.
>
> Who is the new primary maintainer of gdal in debian?
> Group
> maintenence is good, as it make it easier to get new
> people involved
> in maintaining packages, but someone need to take
> responsibility for
> coordinating the effort. Jon, is that you? Is the
> gdal source in the
> Debian GIS cvs?
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: