Re: [DebianGIS] building gdal-1.3.1 packages with mapserver
Ok, Steve's suggestion "libpq-dev | postgresql-dev"
seems to be working. I now have working gdal-1.3.1
binaries. now, what to do with them?
Mapserver needed a simillar fix inorder to make the
4.6.1 version work with gdal-1.3.1 and the new
postgres configuration. I have made binaries for it as
well, but still need to test some more. Also I plan to
add support for a php5-mapscript package.
Jon
--- Steve Halasz <debian@adkgis.org> wrote:
> Jon,
>
> On Fri, 2005-10-07 at 09:19 -0700, Jon Saints wrote:
> > Thank you Frank. That was of great help.
> >
> > I also found this note in the pkg info for
> > postgresql-dev:
> >
> > "The former postgresql-dev package has been split
> up
> > into libpq-dev for client-side development and
> > postgresql-server-dev-<version> packages for
> > server-side development. However, this package
> does
> > not
> > depend on postgresql-server-dev-<version>."
>
> This is not a pg server type package. postgis is an
> example of a package
> that is a pg server extension.
>
> >
> > So, given that and Frank's information that
> versions
> > where handled at run time I change the control
> file
> > line:
> >
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.25), zlib1g-dev,
> > libcfitsio-dev, netcdfg-dev, libtiff4-dev,
> > libjasper-1.701-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev,
> > libungif4-dev, libhdf4g-dev, postgresql-dev,
> > postgresql-client, libxerces26-dev, unixodbc-dev,
> > libsqlite0-dev, python-dev, python-numeric,
> doxygen,
> > d-shlibs, libgeos-dev
> >
> > to:
> >
> > Build-Depends: debhelper (>> 4.1.25), zlib1g-dev,
> > libcfitsio-dev, netcdfg-dev, libtiff4-dev,
> > libjasper-1.701-dev, libpng12-dev, libjpeg62-dev,
> > libungif4-dev, libhdf4g-dev, libpq-dev,
> > postgresql-server-dev-7.4 |
> postgresql-server-dev-8.0,
> > postgresql-client-7.4 | postgresql-client-8.0,
> > libxerces26-dev, unixodbc-dev, libsqlite0-dev,
> > python-dev, python-numeric, doxygen, d-shlibs,
> > libgeos-dev
>
> I think libpq-dev | postgresql-dev is all that is
> required. Even
> postgresql-client should probably be dropped.
> postgresql-dev is there to
> ease backporting. See:
>
>
http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2005/06/msg00500.html
>
> Steve
>
> >
> > With this change I was able to build and install,
> > remove gdal-1.3.1 packages.
> >
> > Does this look good to everyone?
> >
> > Thanks
> > Jon
> >
> >
> >
> > --- Frank Warmerdam <warmerdam@pobox.com> wrote:
> >
> > > On 10/7/05, Jon Saints <saintsjd@yahoo.com>
> wrote:
> > > > This brings up an interesting question...
> these
> > > > packages are now postgresql version specific.
> > > What is
> > > > the best way to deal with the new
> multi-posgresql
> > > in
> > > > terms of the gdal package? Do I need to make
> two
> > > > gdals, one for postgres-7.4 and another for
> > > > postgres-8.0?
> > >
> > > Jon,
> > >
> > > >From GDAL's point of view it can access either
> > > version given
> > > either version of the client libraries. That
> is,
> > > all version
> > > specific decisions are done at runtime.
> > >
> > > But if it came down to this, I would advocate
> just
> > > supporting
> > > the postgres 8 version. I would add if
> necessary we
> > > could
> > > have a separate gdal-postgres plugin driver like
> we
> > > do with
> > > GRASS.
> > >
> > > > New to packaging and I could use the opinion
> of
> > > some
> > > > experts.
> > >
> > > I should stress I am not a debian packaging
> expert.
> > >
> > > Best regards,
> > > --
> > >
> >
>
---------------------------------------+--------------------------------------
> > > I set the clouds in motion - turn up | Frank
> > > Warmerdam, warmerdam@pobox.com
> > > light and sound - activate the windows |
> > > http://pobox.com/~warmerdam
> > > and watch the world go round - Rush |
> Geospatial
> > > Programmer for Rent
> > >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> > > Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
> > >
> >
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
> > >
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> > Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
> >
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Pkg-grass-general mailing list
> Pkg-grass-general@lists.alioth.debian.org
>
http://lists.alioth.debian.org/mailman/listinfo/pkg-grass-general
>
Reply to: