Re: [Pkg-grass-general] gdal/grass -- need your comments
> Just an observation:
>
> + --with-freetype --with-readline --with-nls --with-dbm \
> + --without-glw --without-odbc \
> + --without-blas --without-lapack --without-dbm \
>
> --without-dbm wins which is correct :-)
>
> + --with-blas-libs=/usr/lib/atlas \
> + --with-lapack-libs=/usr/lib/atlas \
>
> No need to put in these dependencies, no code is using that.
also,
Any use for --with-dbm or --without-dbm was removed about a year ago
IIRC, just omit.
why --without-odbc? unixodbc-dev package is in build-depends.
why --without-glw? xlibmesa-gl-dev package is in build-depends.
suggestion:
--with-tcltk-includes=/usr/include/tcl8.3 \
--with-postgres-includes=/usr/include/postgresql \
--with-motif --with-motif-includes=/usr/X11R6/include \
--with-readline --with-gdal --with-cxx --with-glw \
--with-freetype --with-freetype-includes=/usr/include/freetype2 \
--with-nls
maybe --with-gdal is redundant now.
Hamish
Reply to: