Re: [Pkg-grass-general] Re: Bug#264566: Any progress on grass 5.7?

[Hamish <hamish_nospam@yahoo.com>]

> I do not think 5.3 is much more stable than 5.7, anyway (or, am I
> wrong?), and 5.0 is definitely too old. We work with 5.7 as users, in
> production, without major problems. And things should stabilize soon.
> In my view, the best thing for Debian-GIS would be to get ready
> (solving the grass57-gdal-qgis intricacies) for January or so, when
> the whole system should be ready.


mmph, forgot in that last email- qgis needs GRASS 5.7 (for GRASS support).




by the way, this is worth checking out.

http://www.jump-project.org/

While "open source", I'm not sure which license it uses.
It would have to be tested with one of the newly-included in Debian java
clones before considering as well...




Hamish