Re: gcc-3.1 for hurd-i386
On Thu, Apr 25, 2002 at 04:03:15PM -0700, Jeff Bailey wrote:
> Hmm. We've already switched to gcc-3.0 (and so far haven't built a
> gcc-2.95 - Our glibc doesn't contain the magic to make everything
> friendly between the two) for all the C stuff. I wasn't sure if since
> we had a clean slate (There are no packages in Debian for us that are
> older than a week or so) if we should use gcc-3.1 right away.
>
> I'm definetly not pushing for anything before Woody (eg. We haven't
> filed a request to get gcc-defaults updated, because we don't want to
> risk any accidental problems). I'm just trying to figure out what's
> best to plan for. If you prefer that we stick to gcc-3.0 and g++-3.0,
> then I will let the buildd go ahead and build the C++ packages. If
> you say that I can switch to g++-3.1 in 2 or 3 weeks, then I will hold
> off until then on any C++ packages.
>
> We also don't mind being a test bed, since we're not a released arch,
> our users are used to some hardships. =)
Well, I for one would like to see you wait for GCC 3.1. I'm with
Matthias; I'd like to see a complete switchover post-woody, for all
architectures.
--
Daniel Jacobowitz Carnegie Mellon University
MontaVista Software Debian GNU/Linux Developer
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-gcc-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
Reply to: