[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: gcc-3.0 snapshot...



On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 11:45:05PM +0200, Matthias Klose wrote:
> Ben Collins writes:
>  > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 01:10:30PM -0500, Gordon Sadler wrote:
>  > > On Tue, Apr 03, 2001 at 12:43:16PM -0400, Ben Collins wrote:
>  > > > For the first time I was able to compile the gcc-3.0 CVS and build glibc
>  > > > 2.2.3pre1 with it on sparc-linux. Even more so, there were no errors
>  > > > from the glibc make check, and the library installed without any
>  > > > problems.
> 
> see the thread about gcc bootstraps in March:
> 
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-03/msg01319.html
> 	http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-04/msg00036.html

Not responding right now, but I'll take a look at it.

>  > > > What I want to do is upload the current snapshot I have (since I know it
>  > > > to be working) into unstable. Hppa and ia64 require gcc-3.0, and I want
>  > > > to also get started on a libc6-64 for ultrasparc.
> 
> Seems to be the right time. In
> http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc/2001-04/msg00121.html Mark Mitchell asks for 
> more testing:
> 
>   "If people would begin building commonly used programs (XWindows,
>   Emacs, etc.) with the GCC 3.0 branch and reporting any problems, 
>   that would be great.  I will set up a more formal mechanism for that
>   shortly."
> 
> Note that at least on ia64 the ABI for exception handling will
> change. Not sure about the other architectures.

I'll warn Bdale.

>  > > > Any objections, comments or other patches anyone wants to include?
> 
> gcc-version.dpatch from 2.95 should be included (include 'Debian' in
> version string).

Adding it now.

>  > > As a daily user/upgrader on unstable, I enjoy being a guinea pig -), I
>  > > would hope that you get feedback from the gcc maintainer(M. Klose?) at a
>  > > minimum, before uploading gcc-3.0 to unstable.
>  > 
>  > Matthias has already turned over gcc-3.0 maintainence to a group of
>  > about 9 of us, all on this list, which is why I posted here (which
>  > includes Matthias). Matthias remains maintainer of gcc-2.95, solely.
> 
> Perhaps we should document this group in the README or in a
> README.maintainers.

I'll grab the list of original ones and put it in the README.

-- 
 -----------=======-=-======-=========-----------=====------------=-=------
/  Ben Collins  --  ...on that fantastic voyage...  --  Debian GNU/Linux   \
`  bcollins@debian.org  --  bcollins@openldap.org  --  bcollins@linux.com  '
 `---=========------=======-------------=-=-----=-===-======-------=--=---'



Reply to: