[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Comments regarding python-unicodedata2_14.0.0+ds-5_amd64.changes



Hello,

On Wed 02 Mar 2022 at 09:02AM +08, Yao Wei wrote:

> Hi,
>
> On Tue, Mar 01, 2022 at 05:10:40PM -0700, Sean Whitton wrote:
>> > My guess is these are generated function signatures and their inputs are self-contained in the comments.
>> >
>> > I can try generating those again at build time if we need to regenerate this.
>>
>> You don't need to actually regenerate, just confirm that it's possible.
>> Let me know.  Thanks!
>
> These can be generated with a script in Python source code:
>
>   python3 ${PYTHON3_SRC}/Tools/clinic/clinic.py -f unicodedata.c
>
> However, I suspect that they are using the older version of it since the
> generated results with the tool from Python 3.9.10 or Python 3.11.0a5
> don't match the version in the unicodedata2 source, especially the
> generated headers and function wrappers in unicodedata.c.h

Thanks, that's good enough for NEW purposes.

Nevertheless, it would be good if you could sync things up.

-- 
Sean Whitton

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: