[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: a "fonts-recommended" metapackage?



Quoting Fabian Greffrath (2019-02-15 08:45:00)
> Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> > ...and my previous remark quoted above was pulled from vague memory,
> > when I noticed the oddity of Ghostscript not depending on any of them.
> > How embarrasing!  Thanks for pointing it out!
> 
> I just found this, so apparently we discussed this issue before some 8
> years ago:
> 
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=613912
> 
> Most of the discussion still holds true. Now add to this equation the fact
> that fonts-urw-base35 is a separate project now with its own proper
> releases.

Yes, and it seems you ended up following my suggestion in 
https://bugs.debian.org/613912#40 - when true fonts source later became 
indisputably separate from Ghostscript source :-)

 - Jonas

-- 
 * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
 * Tlf.: +45 40843136  Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

 [x] quote me freely  [ ] ask before reusing  [ ] keep private

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: signature


Reply to: