[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: a "fonts-recommended" metapackage?



Am Samstag, den 09.02.2019, 13:58 +0100 schrieb Jonas Smedegaard:
> libgs9 does not need gsfonts - it is up to its consumers to decide
> which fonts they each need.

Are you aware of the fact that you are shipping duplicates of all the
fonts in libgs9-common?

https://dedup.debian.net/compare/libgs9-common/fonts-urw-base35

 - Fabian

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: