On 2017-05-31 04:20, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
Well, strictly speaking WOFF fonts are not package documentation so I'd reject a package that has these fonts moved there. This is just a workaround for a shortcoming in the fontconfig package that we have yet to fix (see my previous mail). As I stated before, I'd prefer if we could simply not package WOFF fonts until we have sorted out this issue on the fontconfig side.
I agree that the WOFFs are not package documentation. They are needed by the package to make the html/css example files in the documentation directory display correctly. I was thinking of providing symlinks from the documentation directory into /usr/share/fonts/woff/packagename/... once the fontconfig issue is addressed and we can package WOFF.
Bobby de Vos