Re: [Pkg-fonts-devel] Update for fonts-sil-annapurna
On 05/31/2017 12:20 PM, Fabian Greffrath wrote:
> Bobby de Vos wrote:
>> For either of these packages, would you accept the WOFF files under the
>> package documentation directory? If not, would you accept the package
>> not containing WOFF files at all (in any location)?
> Well, strictly speaking WOFF fonts are not package documentation so I'd
> reject a package that has these fonts moved there. This is just a
> workaround for a shortcoming in the fontconfig package that we have yet to
> fix (see my previous mail). As I stated before, I'd prefer if we could
> simply not package WOFF fonts until we have sorted out this issue on the
> fontconfig side.
> BTW, does anyone have bug numbers about packaged WOFF fonts causing
> problems that I could refer to when preparing the fontconfig NMU?
I think we're looking at:
But Bobby and Daniel can correct me. There might be others related to that topic.
https://packages.debian.org/file:woff is probably helpful to find out which packages have an impact on this.
> - Fabian
> Pkg-fonts-devel mailing list