Am Freitag, den 13.11.2015, 23:46 +0100 schrieb Gioele Barabucci: > I have a doubt. The source contains both a TTF and a OTF file. > Currently > both are installed. Does it make sense? In general, I'd say "no". Except, maybe, for some heavily used packages like fonts-freefont-* which have many reverse-dependencies, which in turn rely on hard-coded paths to certain font files and are dependent on them being in one specific format or the other. I doubt, though, that this is the case for ttf-radisnoir. However, please check its reverse-dependencies, if any. Furthermore, the package name being prefixed with "ttf-" is very misleading for his package. In general, please adapt packages to the team's usual schema of prefixing packages with "fonts-". This does also apply to the femkeklaver package that I just reviewed some minutes ago, sorry for this oversight: Please turn ttf-* packages into transitional package depending on the fonts-* pendants and providing symlinks to the fonts' previous locations. > As always. I have not generated the changelog yet and I've left the > package marked as UNRELEASED. I am still not convinced by debian/.gitignore, but this is merely a personal preference. Apart from this, it looks fine. However, please note that I am not going to upload any more font packages starting with ttf-*. Thanks, Fabian
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part