Quoting Kess Vargavind (2015-05-14 14:03:22) > I quickly tested your packages and they look fine to me. Thanks for > all your work; much appreciated as this pending upload will cover > several scripts that currently are missing in Debian! You are probably referring to the fonts available only unhinted. I was quite excited when, after installing that package, tested by browsing https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_writing_systems#List_of_writing_scripts_by_adoption and https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Brahmic_scripts#Comparison which seemingly (although I cannot judge if correctly) displays all glyphs. > A petite detail that may be fixed later: > > * The metapackage `fonts-noto` is missing the number 64 in its > description, “currently are covered” Ohh, yes. Fixed in git now. Thanks :-) Speaking of which, I was considering to instead mention actual script names (like font family names), to aid in searching. I extract the facts at package build time so it wouldn't be a burden/ability for translation, only arguably bloating the long description needlesly. What do you think? Does that sound sensible or silly to do? - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature