[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

[Pkg-fonts-devel] Bug#754926: Help to review and sponsor Noto fonts for CJK

On Wed, May 13, 2015 at 10:25:27PM +0200, Jonas Smedegaard wrote:
> Quoting Jonas Smedegaard (2015-05-13 19:00:05)
> > I chose to only package a single flavor of the CJK fonts for now - the 
> > most compact and complete flavor.  I envision only a potential need 
> > for one other flavor - the biggest one not needing "Localized forms" 
> > (locl) support.  I've postponed including that until someone express 
> > an actual need for it.
> [...]
> > I will take a look at your packaging anyway - maybe you had some good 
> > ideas in your packaging that can be adopted.
> I notice that you chose to package the biggest flavor of single-locale 
> OTF files, whereas I packaged the multi-locale TTC file.
> Please test my packaging and tell if usable for you, or if not file 
> separate bugreports about which issues you encounter (what programs you 
> cannot use it with or similar) so we can judge if relevant to extend 
> with another flavor of the CJK fonts.  My packaging is not yet approved 
> by ftpmasters but available at 
> https://debian.jones.dk/pkg/printing/fonts-noto/

Hi Jonas,

- The package looks good. It can display 骨 (U+9AA8) for Simplified
  Chinese and Traditional Chinese correctly in gnome-terminal. Thanks
  for the work.

- LibreOffice Writer does not display 骨 (U+9AA8) correctly in
  Traditional Chinese. I think this is not related to fonts-noto-cjk
  since it cannot display correctly even using separated font files.

- The expect result of 骨 (U+9AA8) is described in [0].

[0] https://github.com/adobe-fonts/source-han-sans/raw/release/SourceHanSansReadMe.pdf

ChangZhuo Chen (陳昌倬) <czchen@gmail.com>
Key fingerprint = EC9F 905D 866D BE46 A896  C827 BE0C 9242 03F4 552D

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: