On 09:07 Fri 21 Sep , Paul Wise wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 20, 2012 at 11:29 PM, Vasudev Kamath wrote:
>
> > Reading that mail again it looks like only for deb creation xz
> > compression and nothing told about default compression for source
> > tarball as xz or is it implicit? If not do you think its worth
> > introducing xz compression for source tarball through dh-make-font? It
> > does save a lot by compression source tarball using xz
>
> In the case where upstream doesn't have a tarball, that would be fine.
> We should ship upstream tarballs where they exist. It would also be a
> good idea to encourage upstreams to switch to xz for their tarballs.
Thanks I will keep it in mind. In some cases fonts will be given as
zip what to do in that case?
Best Regards
--
Vasudev Kamath
http://copyninja.info
Connect on ~friendica: copyninja@{frndk.de | vasudev.homelinux.net}
IRC nick: copyninja | vasudev {irc.oftc.net | irc.freenode.net}
GPG Key: C517 C25D E408 759D 98A4 C96B 6C8F 74AE 8770 0B7E
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature