Quoting Nicolas Spalinger (nicolas_spalinger@sil.org): > And then we have open fonts released by upstream authors on > meta-foundries like the OFLB (OpenFontLibrary) which gives us ttf-oflb-foo. > > But I guess we can extend the concept, as long as the naming procedure > is consistent across our packages. What is the renaming procedure > currently? We didn't rename many fonts yet. I actually just renamed ttf-sil-yi to ttf-sil-nuosusil (in that case because the upstream name changed). If we decide to rename the existing century-catalogue and inconsolata packages, then we should go the same way (which is described in a wiki page in Debian wiki: basically the new packages Conflicts and Provides the old one).
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature