> >Well, yes, the objective. But forcing current font maintainers to > >suddenly be part of this group does the project no good - all we > >can/should do is invite current font maintainers to come here. Exactly. And I'll even be clearer. Packaging ALL fonts is NOT the objective of this group. As we perfectly know we will never enforce this on some of the current maintainers (and we won't even try) and given that some font packages maintainers do not feel the need to join the group....and are actually doing good job, I personnally don't want us to say more than "we are a group of volunteers who package some of the fonts used in Debian". Quite loose definition, but that's how one gets accepted in Debian, IMHO..we have to respect the work done by others. > well... true ... but the manteiner does not say even if he is alive ... > and i think those fonts are important for desktop users (like i am) > > > well ... i tried ... if you need a mantainer that pass the roxen from > dependency to remcomend ... i'll be here :P Here, we have a package that seems abandoned. I suggest you first contact the QA team and check with them if adopting the package is OK
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature