Re: iproute2, alternative tables, no default route: routing trouble for localhost
В Птн, 18/08/2006 в 16:21 +0200, Hans van Kranenburg пишет:
> Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> > В Птн, 18/08/2006 в 14:20 +0100, George Borisov пишет:
> >> Покотиленко Костик wrote:
> >>> So, to summarize, the is no default route in main routing table.
> >>> Each group of clients is to be routed through its respective
> >>> connection, and, when its connection is down it is not to be
> >>> routed.
> >> Last time I successfully configured split routing I did have a
> >> default gateway in the main table.
> >>
> >>
> >> Hope this helps,
> >
> > Unfortunately, all samples in the net's resources are *having*
> > default route in main table, that's why it's so difficult for me to
> > understand what is happening.
>
> Hi,
>
> Perhaps some examples from my configuration can help you. I've been
> experimenting with split routing the last few months. Instead of using
> /etc/network/interfaces and ifupdown, i created an init script that
> configures network interfaces and routing with iproute. It's not perfect
> yet (and part of the comment in there are dutch), but it does the job:
>
> http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/mynetwork
> http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/rt_tables
>
> Documentation I used:
> http://lartc.org/howto/lartc.rpdb.multiple-links.html
> http://www.ssi.bg/~ja/nano.txt
>
> Some lines from the iptables firewall script:
> http://od11.fttd-s.tudelft.nl/~knorrie/iproute/firewall
>
> CONNMARK is supported by a >2.6.12 kernel.
>
> HTH
> I cant promise the files (at the http://od11..) will be there online
> forever...
Thanks for sharing.
My setup uses /etc/network/interfaces, if<up|down>, /etc/ppp/ip.<up|
down>. So it doen't depend on the interface numbers being switched after
DSL reconnect. It depend of PPP's "provider-name" options.
Hope someday I'll be able to share my scripts.
--
Покотиленко Костик <casper@meteor.dp.ua>
Reply to: