Re: man-in-the-middle

[Arnt Karlsen <arnt@c2i.net>]

On Thu, 7 Oct 2004 08:20:40 -0700 (PDT), Sysmin wrote in message 
<[🔎] 20041007152040.4610.qmail@web60408.mail.yahoo.com>:

> Is it just me or is this post rather ridiculous? It is
> hard to even answer questions when you don't know what
> the client is even trying to do. It doesn't even make
> sense on why someone would even want that
> configuration, or what the value of such a
> configuration would be. If this is a consulting job
> the customer should tell you want they are trying to
> do in the end, because you might have a better idea of
> how to accomplish the task. 
> 
> I am sorry if this sounds like complaining but this is
> the information we have: 2 Windows boxes, 1 linux box,
> and 4 public IPs. Forgive me if I missed something, I
> was skimming the posts. I think as a consultant you
> should ask them a lot more questions. Like one of the
> previous posters had mentioned, they probably don't
> know anything about networking and are trying to do
> something very simple that could be accomplished by a
> better configuration.
> 
> When you find out what they were trying to do please
> post back. I am very interested to find out what they
> were trying to accomplish.  

..not a script kiddie asking for MIB ideas?  ;-)

-- 
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
  Scenarios always come in sets of three: 
  best case, worst case, and just in case.