Re: ipmasquerading rete domestica
On Thu, 18 Mar 2004 11:43:11 +0100,
David Jardine <david@jardine.de> wrote in message
<[🔎] 20040318104311.GA656@quash>:
> On Thu, Mar 18, 2004 at 02:39:33AM +0100, Arnt Karlsen wrote:
> > On Mon, 15 Mar 2004 20:15:00 +0100,
> > faz <fabrizio@chiozzi.it> wrote in message
> > <[🔎] 405600B4.9050302@chiozzi.it>:
> >
> [...]
>
> > > I'd like to use woody stable (2.2) like gateway (router,firewall
> >
> > ..Woody is 3.0, 2.2 is Potato, make up your mind. ;-)
>
> I expect he means the 2.2 kernel.
..I would not argue gainst your guess, only against his IMHO
_bad_ choise of kernel and firewall, if you guessed right. ;-)
--
..med vennlig hilsen = with Kind Regards from Arnt... ;-)
...with a number of polar bear hunters in his ancestry...
Scenarios always come in sets of three:
best case, worst case, and just in case.
Reply to: