Re: dhcp server subnetting
Yeah, my original post had a syntax error.
Forgot the dot zero at the end.
Mike
Quoting IT - Sven Mueller <debiansec@berndes.com>:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Friday 27 September 2002 18:56, Mike Egglestone wrote:
> > Basically, is it OK networking practise to setup my eth1 as follows?:
> >
> > Network 10.0.0.0
> > IP address 10.0.0.1
> > Netmask 255.255.254
> > broadcast 10.0.1.255
> >
> > My dhcpd.conf would serve out IP's in this range:
> > 10.0.0.20 - 10.0.1.254
> > Would this give me a Legal subnet of 512? (minus the network and broadcast
> > IP's of course)
>
> Should work OK if you set the netmask to 255.255.254.0, otherwise you would
> only be able to use IPs 10.0.0.0 and 10.0.0.1 (which are network and
> broadcast respectively ;-).
>
> > I understand that I probably should throw a 3rd nic in the box and have 2
> > complete subnets on my private side, but I think my Motherboard is all out
> > of PCI slots.
>
> Naa, not necessary. However, I really wonder which net might be big enough to
>
> need more than 254 dhcp based Ip addresses without having major performance
> problems.
>
> Regards,
>
> Sven Müller
> - - IT - Network&Infrastructure -
>
> - --
> * Heinrich Berndes Haushaltstechnik GmbH & Co KG
> * Wiebelsheidestrasse 55, 59757 Arnsberg, Germany
> * Phone: +49 2932 475-282 / FAX: -325
> * http://www.berndes.com
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
>
> iD8DBQE9mYHzss2fOBI6SZ0RAuymAJ4l2Nm6udhP5N6MH4ZIGfmDfXzQKwCffWBm
> DBnNdmD7MS5q6cAQDAvPRFk=
> =9iJK
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-firewall-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact
> listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
>
-------------------------------------------------
This mail sent through IMP: http://horde.org/imp/
Reply to: