Hi! As you remeber we gave the audience this year the possibilitie to give us indirect feedback by feedback forms. Here follows a detailed list of the results. Necessary comments by me are marked with "COMMENT:", personal comments will follow in a sperate mail, further interpretition of this feedback is left to the reader. With the first three questions the auditor could rate the relevance of the topic, the competence of the speaker and means of presentation [FIXME: Add URL to the form for those who didn't saw them]. The results of those are printed as three numbers ranging from 1 to 5 (where 1 is the best note and 5 the worst), telling the best note, the worst note and the average. In the last two questions the auditor had free text fields to point us to conflicts with other talks and to give us general comments. As far as possible I already talked to the speakers while their memory was still fresh. Speakers please note that these numbers are slightly different from those I told you, because we got additional feedback after I talked to you. Sorry. Those who I didn't met (and who might not read this list), whill be mailed seperatly soon. Topic: "Debian Security" Speaker: Joey Schulze Attendees: 70 Feedback forms: 14 Quote: 20% Relevance: b: 1 w: 3 a: 2.15 Speaker: b: 1 w: 3 a: 1.23 Presentation: b: 1 w: 4 a: 2.07 Conflicts: - Having more Debian talks on Thursday would have been better because there were mostlu business talks COMMENT: We planed to have a full schedule on Thursday, but two speakers needed to cancell their talks - UG1 (COMMENT: That would be... "Neue Regeln für Linux" by "Edin Dizdarevic") Comments: - Zu allgemein, teilweise um die Hauptaussagen "drumrumgeredet", nicht auf den Punkt gebracht. Maus aus dem Bild? :) COMMENT: That's from the only attendee who rated the speaker competence with a three COMMENT: Could be translated as: "To generic, movede arround the main conclussion, didn't got to the point. Mouse on the screen?" - A bit to little time (no possibility to ask any questions - Debian Praesenz ist sehr gut! Es gibt immer wieder neue Ideen im direkten Kontakt, auf die man sonst nicht kommt. COMMENT: Could be translated as: "Debians presence ist very good! There are always new ideas in a direct contact you wont get otherwise." Topic: Internationalisation Speaker: Luk Claes Attendees: 12 Feedback forms: 3 Quote: 25% Relevance: b: 1 w: 3 a: 2 Speaker: b: 1 w: 1 a: 1 Presentation: b: 2 w: 2 a: 2 Conflicts: none Comments: - Redner sprach in Fremdsprache COMMENT: Could be translated as: "Speaker spoke in a foreign language" Topic: Debian Archive Speaker: Goswin Brederlow Attendees: 35 Feedback forms: 7 Quote: 20% Relevance: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.71 Speaker: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.42 Presentation: b: 1 w: 3 a: 1.85 Conflicts: - EG (COMMENT: That would be "Wer hat Angst vor MS Exchange? Alternativen aus dem Open Source Lager" by Carsten Brunke) Comments: - too low level - spelling mistakes, example conffig file Topic: The volatile Archive Speaker: Martin Zobel-Helas Attendees: 30 Feedback forms: 26.67% Relevance: b: 2 w: 5 a: 2.625 Speaker: b: 1 w: 3 a: 1.69 Presentation: b: 2 w: 4 a: 3 Conflicts: none Comments: - * 10 Minuten-Vortrag, in den mehr reingepasst haette - Zeit war ja da... * Vielleicht naechstes mal einmal zuvor abchecken, wieviel man in 45' rueberbringen koennte * www-Adressen gibt es auch anders - nicht auf 3 slides Maus aus dem Bild :) COMMENT: Could be translated as: * 10 minute talk, which could have contained more - there was plenty of time... * Perhaps check next time, how much you can put in 45' * www addresses are available in a different form - not on three slides mouse from screen Topic: Debian Women Project Speaker: Meike Reichle Attendees: 60 Feedback forms: 12 Quote: 20% Relevance: b: 1 w: 4 a: 1.75 Speaker: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.08 Presentation: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.25 Conflicts: None. Comments: - best spoken english of all speakers so far today - Very nice talk! - Speaker was a bit fast for people not knowing English so good - Speaker was a bit too fast for people, doesn't know the language perfect Topic: CDD: Current and Future Speaker: Enrico Zini Attendees: 50 Feedback forms: 9 Quote: 18% Relevance: b: 1 w: 3 a: 2.11 Speaker: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.33 Presentation: b: 1 w: 2 a: 1.11 COMMENT: One needed to express his rate for the presentation by enlarging the skale by 5 additional points to the "very good" side. I still counted that as "1" ;) Conflicts: none Comments: - VERY GOOD AND FUNNY SPEAKER - Total World Domination is coming... - very funny way to hold technical lectures Topic: m32r Architecture Speaker: Yutaka Niibe Attendees: 5 Feedback forms: 2 Quote: 40% Relevance: b: 2 w: 3 a: 2.50 Speaker: b: 1 w: 1 a: 1.00 Presentation: b: 2 w: 2 a: 2.00 Conflicts: - Aaargh! Fernanda about women in free sw! Comments: - Speak a bit slower, please. - Title misleading, as talk was also about bootstrapping Debian and dpkg-cross! Topic: Kerberos V5 mit Debian Speaker: Mike Wiesner Attendees: 50 Feedback forms: 15 Quote: 30% Relevance: b: 1 w: 2 a: 2.00 Speaker: b: 1 w: 3 a: 1.40 Presentation: b: 1 w: 3 a: 1.8 Conflicts: - Reverse engenering Comments: - Super. Keep on going! - a bit too fast - German only, unfortunately. Topic: Debian OCaml Speaker: Stefano Zacchiroli Attendees: 12 Feedback Forms: 3 Quote: 25% Relevance: b: 2 w: 3 a: 2.33 Speaker: b: 1 w: 1 a: 1.00 Presentation: b: 1 w: 4 a: 2.33 COMMENT: The feedback form with the "4" didn't had any further comments Conflicts: none. Comments: - Speak a bit slower. Topic: Knowledge, Power, Beer Speaker: Florian Möllers COMMENT: changed in the last second from Andreas Tille who couldn't attend Attendees: 30 Feedback forms: 1 Quote: 3.33% Relevance: b: 4 w: 4 a: 4.00 Speaker: b: 2 w: 2 a: 2.00 Presentation: b: 2 w: 2 a: 2.00 Conflict: none Comments: - Not prepared enough, but thank you for giving the talk! Topic: m23 Speaker: Hauke Goos-Habermann Attendees: 25 Feedback forms: 5 Quote: 20% Relevance: b: 1 w: 4 a: 2.4 Speaker: b: 1 w: 4 a: 1.8 Presentation: b: 2 w: 5 a: 2.6 Conflicts: none Comments: none Topic: Ubuntu Development Model Speaker: Michael Bank Attendees: 20 Feedback forsm: 0 Quote: 0% Relevance: b: w: a: Speaker: b: w: a: Presentation: b: w: a: Conflicts: none Comments: none There is one Feedback form left which couldn't be matched to any talk, because the atendee forgot to cross which talk he is giving feedback for. However, this form was between some other fedback forms about Joeys Debian-Security Talk, but the forms got mixed up very much... Joey, you decide if this form is for you, since I missed your talk, I can't say anything about it ;) Relvance: 4 Speaker: 2 Presentation: 3 Conflicts: none Comments: Zu viele Dinge, zu "ungeordnet" -> hat ueber "alles und nichts" erzaehlt, wie Buzzwords => verwirrend fuer die meisten Leute, lieber etwas staerker fokusieren COMMENT: Could be translated as: "To many things, to 'unsorted' -> talked about 'everything and nothing', like buzzwords => confusing for the most people, please fokus more" Please note, that the Debian-Day is not a competition of speakers. It's impossible to rank speakers which talked about different topics - all you can do based on this feedback is think about it, and try to be better next time, if yoy think, the "bad" feedback was right. Yours sincerely, Alexander -- http://learn.to/quote/ http://www.catb.org/~esr/faqs/smart-questions.html
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature