Re: Two wishlist patches submitted to allow static build of binutils and gcc

[Loïc Minier <lool@dooz.org>]

 I understand your goal with the patches; I wonder whether you'd be
 tempted to add an unconditional binutils static pass instead, as to
 have a static version of libbfd?

 The reason I'm asking for that is because some packages actually link
 to libbfd and end up with a hard-dependency on the binutils version
 used for that, but they would really be fine statically linking with
 it.

 This is the case of the linux perf tools for instance.

    Cheers,
-- 
Loïc Minier