Re: About Debian bug 246061, suppress environment variable
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
> > What do you think of idea of making everything explicit (that means,
> > no implicit variable settings at all)?
>
> I would not be happy about this. Until bug 246061 dpkg-cross uses the
> default approach and suite most of Makefiles. Changing that would lead
> to a extensive configuration process not required today.
Why?
Default configuration file will provide the same values that are currently
hardcoded into dpkg-cross, so ease of usage will not suffer. We may even
implement "include" statement for config file, and split such "base"
setting into a separate file. By the way, user-provided config file will
not replace system config file in this case, but will just be included
from there.
But we will get great advantages:
- - it will be 100% clear what variables are being set, and what values they
get. No longer (citing your message) "nobudy really know which ones are
defined".
- - dpkg-cross code itself will become cleaner.
I just tried to implement 'unset' feature, and disliked the result. I
really want to unify variable setting first. I probably will try to do
that, and show you the result (without committing anything). I hope you'll
like it :).
Nikita
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBAA7esTbPknTfAB4RAnzPAJ4vgK5+VxGeTPaevgimMAbo4RMQkwCePOuW
s6ImNr9StDqa3AF+SJwMfZY=
=I9Hb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: