Re: GPL V2 and GPLv3
0> In article <[🔎] email@example.com>,
0> Ben L. Pfaff <URL:mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org> ("Ben") wrote:
Ben> I think that you may be confusing GPLv3 and the GFDL. The GFDL
Ben> is the license with optional Invariant Sections. The GPLv3 does
Ben> not have any concept with that name.
Absolutely right - I was. Thanks for pointing this out. It's a while
since I've had to consider which license to use for my code!
In this case, as Miles pointed out, it's such a small contribution
that I'm happy to re-license as necessary (as determined by the other
branch of this thread!).