Re: [Q]: Emacs CVS status
Kai Grossjohann <email@example.com> writes:
> Marcus Frings <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
>> First of all Emacs complained about the missing DOC-220.127.116.11 which was
>> easy to fix as I just had to rename the existing DOC-18.104.22.168
> Perhaps you weren't building from a pristine working copy? Does it
> hielp to invoke "make distclean" before building the package?
"make maintainer-clean" is the way to get a clean build.