Re: [Q]: Emacs CVS status
Marcus Frings <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> First of all Emacs complained about the missing DOC-184.108.40.206 which was
> easy to fix as I just had to rename the existing DOC-220.127.116.11
Perhaps you weren't building from a pristine working copy? Does it
help to invoke "make distclean" before building the package?
> and then I found out that I couldn't leave Emacs with C-x C-c (void
> variable). The last one seems to be a bug in upstream source as I
> would guess.
Which variable was void?