Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring

[Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net>]

Aaron M. Ucko <ucko@debian.org> wrote:

> Peter S Galbraith <p.galbraith@globetrotter.net> writes:
> 
> > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
> 
> I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)

Absolutely!
 
> > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway.  They don't
> > conflict.  It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though.
> 
> Right, and dict.el has the advantage of being lighter-weight.  I also
> agree that it makes sense to merge the -extra package in to the main
> one, treating individual files' dependencies as recommendations or
> suggestions.  (devscripts and xmms already work this way.)

Thanks, I'll do that.

Also, nobody commented on the removal of `debbugs-el' in favour of a
more inclusive `debian-el' package.  No one objected either, so I'll go
ahead with this too.

Thanks!

Peter