Re: FW: emacs-goodies-el restructuring
Aaron M. Ucko <email@example.com> wrote:
> Peter S Galbraith <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > Nice! dictionary-el looks to be more feature rich than dict.el.
> I should remember to pass all this praise upstream. ;-)
> > I suppose I should leave dict.el in the package anyway. They don't
> > conflict. It needs to be checkdoc cleaned though.
> Right, and dict.el has the advantage of being lighter-weight. I also
> agree that it makes sense to merge the -extra package in to the main
> one, treating individual files' dependencies as recommendations or
> suggestions. (devscripts and xmms already work this way.)
Thanks, I'll do that.
Also, nobody commented on the removal of `debbugs-el' in favour of a
more inclusive `debian-el' package. No one objected either, so I'll go
ahead with this too.