Re: future of emacs20
Peter S Galbraith <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> I'm not a great fan of orphaning complicated packages. Are there users
> that need emacs20 because emacs21 is broken for some things? If not,
> and there's no real reason for emacs20, I'd suggest that you offer it up
> for adoption but don't orphan it. If there are no takers within 1 month
> or so, then pull the package from the archive. That's what I tend to do
> anyway, instead of orphaning.
Ahh, right. I didn't think about the fact that I could actually
explicitly have it removed. That may be a better idea. I'll think
about it for a little bit, and then I guess I'll post something to
debian-devel once I know what I want to do.
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org; previously @cs.utexas.edu
GPG starting 2002-11-03 = 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4