Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 06:53:28PM +0200, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > I am not quite sure what kind of decision making process you are looking > for here, but given people on the team willing to work on the packages > under the Debian Edu umbrella, I so not really see the need for much > more consulting as long as no-one complaints. There is not much > formalities involved, and few formalities seem like a good idea. How do > you envison asking the team and getting a definite answer, given our > current team structure? On Thu, Oct 06, 2016 at 05:46:27PM +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > > But we just did that, and noone complaint. The team was never asked > > whether they want to assume maintainership ;). > > that's not how our team works, instead, if you and me (or foo and bar > who are Debian Edu team members) decide we want to packages $pkg under > the Debian Edu umbrealla, we can do this, and it doesn't mean that > other team members are expected to join the maintance of that package. I meant neither of that. I simply thought it would be kind to give room for objections/proposals/… before writing somone else's address into a Maintainer field, be it a single human being or a team. Cheers, Nik
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature