[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: ldap: ou=group versus ou=groups

Hi Andi,

Am Dienstag, 15. Februar 2011, 10:58:12 schrieb Andreas B. Mundt:
> Hi,
> in the process of overhauling the ldap tree, I am thinking about
> renaming ou=group to ou=groups in order to better reflect the plural
> form.
> I don't know why ou=group was chosen, perhaps because the expired and
> in the meantime deleted RFC2307bis used ou=group in an example. I
> cannot imagine that using ou=group or ou=groups makes any difference
> for storing our possix groups, but from what I have seen, it looks as
> if using ou=groups is more common and the linguistic correct form.
> The change is not worth an argument, but I think as we need to make
> some changes in ldap with the upcoming release anyway, we should use
> that chance to also improve that little thing.
> Neither using ou=groups nor ou=group is a big deal, but we have to
> live for some (hopefully long) time with what we choose now ...
> What do you think?
> Best regards,
>        Andi

+1 from Mike...



mike gabriel, dorfstr. 27, 24245 barmissen
fon: +49 (4302) 281418, fax: +49 (4302) 281419

GnuPG Key ID 0x1943CA5B
mail: m.gabriel@das-netzwerkteam.de, http://das-netzwerkteam.de


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.

Reply to: