Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?

To: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
Cc: "Bjarne Nielsen" <bjarne@elb.as>
Subject: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
From: Knut Yrvin <kyrvin@trolltech.com>
Date: Thu, 1 Mar 2007 19:59:41 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 200703011959.41551.kyrvin@trolltech.com>
In-reply-to: <op.toe02lg0m42vcm@localhost>
References: <1172525016.5641.12.camel@localhost> <200702271624.44954.rgx@gmx.de> <op.toe02lg0m42vcm@localhost>

On Tuesday 27. February 2007, Bjarne Nielsen wrote:
> I have had several reports on systems more or less crashing when 10 pupils
>   or more tried to use Gimp simultaneously.

Gimp seems to have several memory problems if not tuned to a multiuser 
environment. Former version of Gimp crashed the system by filling up /tmp. 
New issues has occurred. 

I found this page explaining cache settings:  

http://www.gimp.org/unix/howtos/tile_cache.html

Best regards

Knut Yrvin
-- 
Community Manager / Developer Tools - Trolltech ASA
cell: + 47 908 95 765, phone: +47 21 60 27 58
http://www.trolltech.com/products/qt

Reply to:

Prev by Date: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Next by Date: [Bug 1004] networked (not only kde) configs, remaining steps
Previous by thread: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Next by thread: Re: should we ship iceweasel (firefox) on the first cd?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread