Hi, On Thursday 22 November 2007 16:12, RalfGesellensetter wrote: > According to this logic, there should be a separate hostname for lwat, > shouldn't it? No, lwat has nothing to do with it. According to this logic, we should create more (snakeoil) ssl certificates for the different dns names. Currently we only create one for tjener.intern, maybe we should also create one for postoffice.intern, one for www.intern and so on. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpKpygwcR3TM.pgp
Description: PGP signature