Hi, On Tuesday 24 July 2007 14:39, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > [Holger Levsen] > > IMO we should aim to^w^w release 3.0r1 in a month, even if only/mostly > > with documentation fixes (though other fixes are fine too). Then r2 > > another month later. And then concentrate on lenny. > I believe this is too short time frame to manage much improvements, > especially since we have spent a lot of time on the r0 time frame, and > I suspect others like me will have to spend time on other projects > that has been waiting for a while. You were right: now two months have passed and we still haven't released r1 :-/ :-) Time to tackle it a bit more ;) [priorities in bugzilla] > > What do you think? > I liked your previous proposal better. I'm writing this offline and replying to this makes most sense while looking at bugzilla, which I currently cant... > For r1, I want to > - Upgrade the debian-cd build framework to the latest svn version. has that happened? > - Include a windows installer on the CDs and DVD. you mean like the one debian has for lenny now? has anyone looked into using this on etch? > - Include on the DVD some Windows install packages for useful Windows > software (OOo, Firefox, etc). I don't think this has happened and I don't consider this important. There are "free software-cds for windows", why bother to create another? > - Update the documentation. This still needs to be done, content-, translation- and packaging wise. > - Find a way to check the SSL certificates when talking to the LDAP > server, and fix lwat and samba to work with the new setup. has that happened? > - Update libpam-foreground to a clean backport from sid/lenny instead > of our home patched version. I think this has happened, correct? > - Change the task installation framework to handle language specific > list of packages to install. has that happened? > - Update the network-manager packages to use a backport from unstable > to fix some console user access issues. (And only install it in > standalone and not workstation+laptops installs) has that happened? Anything else (besides highprio bugs) we need to fix before we can release r1? regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgprhsDVkTK08.pgp
Description: PGP signature