Hi, On Wednesday 09 May 2007 11:38, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote: > Given that we can polish the next release of Debian Edu forever, and > that the old sarge based release is showing its age, I believe we > should finish up a new stable release soon, with the stuff that is > already working, and prepare for an updated version within three > months. I agree. > I suggest we make a new test04 test release in a few days, update the > documentation to match it the next few days, and then release test04 > (possibly including more bug fixes discovered and implemented while > the documentation was written) as the next stable release of debian > edu in a month. On http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Etch there is a link, called "bugs which we want to fix for etch, are confirmed and not documentation related" which shows all bugs with Priority 1,2 and 3 (excluding the unconfirmed ones and the documentation related ones): http://bugs.skolelinux.no/buglist.cgi?short_desc_type=notregexp&short_desc=.*%28document%7Cconfirm%29.*&product=Skolelinux&long_desc_type=allwordssubstr&long_desc=&bug_file_loc_type=allwordssubstr&bug_file_loc=&bug_status=NEW&bug_status=ASSIGNED&bug_status=REOPENED&priority=P1&priority=P2&priority=P3&emailtype1=substring&email1=&emailtype2=substring&email2=&bugidtype=include&bug_id=&votes=&changedin=&chfieldfrom=&chfieldto=Now&chfieldvalue=&cmdtype=doit&newqueryname=&order=Reuse+same+sort+as+last+time&field0-0-0=noop&type0-0-0=noop&value0-0-0= I suggest we release (the stable version, not test4) not earlier as this link doesnt show any bugs with Prio 1 and 2. Currently thats 4 bugs left (the rest has Prio 3=we want to fix them, but we might not manage.) http://wiki.debian.org/DebianEdu/Status/Etch also shows some more Bugs which are not in bugzilla, I'll start *now* to move them into bugzilla. I think it's important that we use comprehensible criterias when we release. For me this means: no bugs left in bugzilla which are a.) confirmed, b.) not documentation related (i'm willing to argue on that, documentation is important) and c.) have Prio 1 or 2. Of course, this has the "danger" of moving the discussion whether we fix this or that bug into a "bugzilla-war", but a.) I dont think we'll have bugzila-wars, we are reasonable people working on a common goal and b.) this is where such a _discussion_ (not war) belongs :) Also, everybody how has a "pet-bug" is able to see, that "we don't care" and has the opportunity to fix those bugs themselves. regards, Holger
Attachment:
pgpYhgRVSgl5l.pgp
Description: PGP signature