Re: Changes on debian-edu-config
Petter Reinholdtsen a écrit :
>>- added automatic managment of binaries' manpages (or link to
>> "undocumented.7.gz")
>>
>>
>
>I remember something about the undocumnted.7 manual page being
>obsolete. Check policy to see if it is still needed.
>
>
You are right, debian now frowns on this behavior, I deleted the
undocumented links.
(I did not find it in the policy manual, but only in "man dh_undocumented")
Furthemore, the policy told me that missing man pages are considered as
a bug, so a new bug has been filed in bugs.sk.no (#1030)
About policy and compatibility of debian-edu-config, lintian told me that :
W: debian-edu-config source:
package-uses-deprecated-debhelper-compat-version 1
-> should we use "4" compat file stamp ?
W: debian-edu-config source: out-of-date-standards-version 3.6.1
-> shall-we put more recent standards-version ? current policy version
is 3.6.2.2.
>
>
>>- added /etc/default/backdoor empty file (with explanations)
>>
>>
>
>The backdoor system have a problem and should probably be fixed before
>it is better documented. It can make upgrades hang, I believe,
>because the background script isn't closing all the file descriptors.
>
>
Ok, but the /etc/default/backdoor file will certainly not change since
this init script grew better ...
I found #783 : http://bugs.skolelinux.no/show_bug.cgi?id=783
for this issue, but it is closed. If the bug is still here, we should
reopen it.
I have an idea for this issue. If it is still there I will try it and
commit it if it work :
$man ssh
... ...
-N Do not execute a remote command. This is useful for just
forwarding ports (protocol version 2
only).
-T Disable pseudo-tty allocation.
... ...
>>- added lintian-override about xconf_boot errors on lintian
>>
>>
>
>I believe the correct fix is to add "support" for the missing
>arguments, aka accept the arguments and write error messages when they
>are used, Or perhaps remove the script if it is no longer needed.
>
>
ok, done.
>The rest of the changes looked good. :)
>
>
Thanks, and see you soon :)
Regards,
Benjamin
Reply to: