[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

cipux: remaining linda + lintian warnings



Hi,


The following lintian warnings are left:

W: cipux-cibot: zero-byte-file-in-doc-directory 
usr/share/doc/cipux-cibot/html/cipux_setup_ldap_objects.html

I fail to see where this file comes from (and therefore, why it's empty. 
Christan, any pointers?

W: cipux-cibot: script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/disabled/kde3.sh
W: cipux-cibot: script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/disabled/mozilla.sh
W: cipux-cibot: script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/disabled/xchat.sh
W: cipux-cibot: script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/disabled/oo11.sh
W: cipux-cibot: 
script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/disabled/soffice7.sh
W: cipux-cibot: script-not-executable ./etc/cipux/refine.d/enabled/void.sh

Mentioned in another mail already...


The following linda warnings are left:


Check DocumentationCheck failed. Exception KeyError thrown 
('/usr/share/man/man3/CipUX::CAT::Web.3pm.gz').
Check FilesCheck failed. Exception KeyError thrown 
('/usr/share/man/man3/CipUX').
Check DocumentationCheck failed. Exception KeyError thrown 
('/usr/share/man/man3/CipUX::Conversion.3pm.gz').
Check FilesCheck failed. Exception KeyError thrown 
('/usr/share/man/man3/CipUX').

I have not yet checked those, but these are no linda warnings, but linda 
chokes over the files! Any clues anyone?

W: cipux-cibot; File /usr/lib/cipux/sbin/cipux_setup contained in /usr/lib of 
Architecture: all package.
W: cipux-profile; File /usr/lib/cipux/sbin/cipux_profile_fr contained 
in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package.
W: cipux-rpc; File /usr/lib/cipux/bin/cipux_rpc contained in /usr/lib of 
Architecture: all package.
W: cipux-samba; File /usr/lib/cipux/bot/cipux_bot_logon_ldap contained 
in /usr/lib of Architecture: all package.

These files _are_ placed in the wrong directory. According to FHS, /usr/lib is 
for architecture dependent files, but those shell scripts are architecture 
independent. /usr/share/cipux/(s)bin is the proper place for them.
Christian, I hope it's enough to move them there and to change the PATH/some 
pathes? Right? Can you please do this? (This change is also needed for any 
other distribution, which follows FHS)

http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html#USRSHAREARCHITECTUREINDEPENDENTDATA


Christian, I have not read debian/changelog real carefully, but from glimpsing 
over it, I have the impression you either repeat the upstream changelog there 
or use it as upstream changelog. Neither is good. Please use an own 
changelog, debian/changelog is intented for debian packaging changes mostly. 
It's ok to mention big changes, but normally you just say "new upstream 
version $version".


regards,
	Holger

-- 
quoting http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index.de.html#codeofconduct
"When using the Debian mailing lists, please follow these rules:... When 
replying to messages on the mailing list, do not send a carbon copy (CC) to 
the original poster unless they explicitly request to be copied."

We live in the year 2006, a few bytes wasted in the footer of a mail don't 
hurt anymore, but everybody is flooded with information and attention is a 
spare ressource. 
If you send a mail cc: to a list and to me, it will catch my attention even if 
I have none. Please don't. Unless you specifically want to catch my attention 
of course :) 
But If I don't say otherwise, I'm subscribed to the mailinglist (and this is 
true for non-Debian lists as well) and you don't need to cc: me. Thanks.

Attachment: pgpiTdRkO9km0.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: