Monday 10. October 2005 02:23, wrote Øyvind A. Holm: > On 2005-10-10 01:14:52 Øyvind A. Holm wrote: > > I notice the svn version at developer is 1.0.0 . This version is not > > able to cope with FSFS repositories, and there are several other > > shortcomings compared to the current stable version (1.2.3), a summary > > of what’s changed is at http://svn.collab.net/repos/svn/trunk/CHANGES > > . The current svn version could also work, but it is only able to use > > Berkeley DB repositories which is not generally portable unless the > > exact same DB versions are used on the machines. The 1.0.x branch was > > also obsoleted when 1.2.x came out and will probably not be updated > > anymore. > > But on second thoughts, this should not be much of a problem. The > repository can be reloaded at developer using Berkeley DB. The best > thing is probably to stick with the svn version which is in Debian > woody, 1.0.0 . "svn lock/unlock" will not be available, but other things > like versioning of symlinks is done on the client side, so it will still > work. I have sent a mail to drift@s.n about this. I have noticed that you have uploaded a test migration to developer. This is not remotely accessible because of our old SVN version. Just so you all know this will be replaced, when the real migration is done. I have proposed to drift@s.n that the migration is done on Wednesday. -- -Frode Any given program, when running, is obsolete. Petition for "World of Warcraft" on Linux: http://www.blizzpub.net/petition/
Attachment:
pgpP3j0LSHRnk.pgp
Description: PGP signature