Hi, Finn-Arne Johansen wrote: > So if the backport of OOo2 provided by Rene, means that the > OOo-debian-team will continue to provide a backport (also security > patched if needed), then I'm willing to include the backport. But Only As long as it's possible (no one knows what Sun will do but I don't guess they will completely break gcc 3.3) I will. > after I've tested to rebuild the packages. I don't want to end up like > we've done with the woody-version, with a version where we have no source. They build fine in pbuilder/sbuild if you get a j2sdk1.4 package which work (the blackdown one on gwdg is broken, failing preinst). nobse did build -1bpo2 and -1bpo3 himself after I gave him the source. So that shouldn't be a problem. Of course, the wole decision is yours and I don't want to intervene in there. I just wanted to tell that this backport is the official one done by me and want to defend myself against "there's no/broken nn,nb spellchecking" and such things... Regards, Rene
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature