[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: non-free?

* Petter Reinholdtsen <pere@hungry.com> [040320 17:22]:

> The reason non-free is listed in the APT sources, is that lyx depend
> on forms, and forms is in non-free.  I believe I read somewhere that
> lyx no longer need the non-free dependency.  Not sure if there now is
> a "free" version of forms, or if the widget library used by lyx is
> changed.

AFAIK the newer lyx version can use either forms or qt.

Yours sincerely,

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: